logo_hcam

Revista Médica Científica CAMbios

Periodicidad semestral: flujo continuo.

ISSN - Electrónico: 2661-6947 / DOI: 10.36015 • LILACS BIREME (19784); LATINDEX (20666)

Ver PDF (Spanish)
Ver HTML (Spanish)
Ver EPUB (Spanish)

Keywords

Abortion, Spontaneous
Congenital Abnormalities
Heart Defects, Congenital
Abnormal Karyotype
Pregnancy Complications
Fetal Death

How to Cite

1.
Congenital malformations in fetal stillbirth. Cambios rev. méd. [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 29 [cited 2025 Oct. 26];19(2):19-24. Available from: https://revistahcam.iess.gob.ec/index.php/cambios/article/view/661

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Congenital malformations are structural or functional defects produced in embryonic or fetal development, of diverse etiology, some are preventable, so prenatal diagnosis is essential to determine prognosis and obstetric future. OBJECTIVE. Describe the prevalent congenital malformations in stillbirths and highlight the importance of completing the prenatal diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Observational, descriptive and retrospective study. From a population of 276 Clinical Histories with a diagnosis of spontaneous fetal losses, a sample of 41 with congenital malformations was taken from the Obstetric Center, at the Carlos Andrade Marín Specialty Hospital, from January 2017 to
December 2018. Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of deaths with malformations congenital less than 34 weeks of gestation identified by ultrasound, chromosomal and necropsy study. Exclusion criteria: deaths with normal autopsy study. The data were obtained from the MISAS400 system. The analysis was carried out with the Microsoft Excel program. RESULTS. The prevalence of congenital malformations in stillbirths was 14,85% (41; 276), hydrops represented 41,46% (17; 41), of these, 53% (9; 17) found major malformations and in 47% (8; 17) other associated malformations. 17 karyotypes were found, 76,47% (13; 17) were abnormal and 23,52% (4; 17) were normal. DISCUSSION. Maternal comorbidities and family history were relevant factors for the appearance of congenital malformations whose prevalence has yet to be investigated in Ecuador. CONCLUSION. Prevalent congenital malformations and the importance of carrying out prenatal control with complementary
studies to clarify the diagnosis and determine the obstetric future were described.

Ver PDF (Spanish)
Ver HTML (Spanish)
Ver EPUB (Spanish)

References

1. Dulgheroff F, Borges A, Caetano G, Rodrigues da Cunha T, Rocha D, Oliveira F, et al. Fetal structural anomalies diagnosed during the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy using ultrasonography: a retrospective cohort study. Sao Paulo Med. J. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 27]; 137(5): 391-400. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802019000500391&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
2. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Anomalías Congénitas. [Internet]. Géneva. 2016 [citado 2020 Abr 25]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/congenital-anomalies
3. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Correlation between fetal autopsy and prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Apr 16]; 210:201-206. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.024. Available from: https://www.ejog.org/article/S0301-2115(16)31086-7/fulltext
4. Lugmaña G, Carrera S, Albán A. Registro Estadístico de Defunciones Generales. Quito. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC) [Internet]. 2020. [citado 2020 Oct 06]. Disponible en: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Poblacion_y_Demografia/Nacimientos_Defunciones/2020/Boletin_%20tecnico_%20EDG%202019%20prov.pdf
5. Putti P. Defectos congénitos y patologías incompatibles con la vida extrauterina. Rev Méd Urug [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 23]; 32(3):60-65. Disponible en: http://www.rmu.org.uy/revista/proximo/rmu32-3_835_ tos4.pdf
6. Ospina J, Castro D, Hoyos M, Linn K, Montoya J, Porras G. Articulo original Factores asociados a malformaciones congénitas : En un centro de tercer nivel región centro occidental - Colombia (ECLAMC). Rev Méd Risaralda [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2020 Jun 16]; 24(1):15–19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22517/25395203.9317. Disponible en: https://revistas.utp.edu.co/index.php/revistamedica/article/view/9317
7. Cajina C. Malformaciones Congénitas. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud Representación Nicaragua [Internet]. Boletín Informativo. 2015 [citado 2020 Jun 16]; 2–6. Diponible en: https://www.paho.org/nic/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&category_slug=datos-y-estadisticas&alias=711-boletin-informativo-malformaciones-congenitas&Itemid=235
8. Nemescu D, Bratie A, Mihaila A, Navolan D, Tanase A. First trimester combined screening for fetal aneuploidies enhanced with additional ultrasound markers: an 8-year prospective study. Ginekologia Polska [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Apr 27]; 89(4):205-10. ISSN: 0017-0011. Available from: https://journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska/article/view/GP.a2018.0035/44628
9. Manganaro L, Bernardo S, Antonelli A, Vinci V, Saldari M, Catalano C. Fetal MRI of the central nervous system : State-of-the-art. European Journal of Radiology [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 8]; 93(2017):273–283. Available from: https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(17)30238-3/fulltext
10. Meng D, Li Q, Hu X, Wang L, Tan S, Su J, et al. Etiology and Outcome of non- immune Hydrops Fetalis in Southern China : report of 1004 cases. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 15]; 9:(10726):1–6. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47050-6.pdf
11. Schlotawa L, Dierks T, Christoph S, Cloppenburg E, Ohlenbusch A, Korenke G, et al. Severe neonatal multiple sulfatase deficiency presenting with hydrops fetalis in a preterm birth patient. JIMD Reports [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 16]; (July):48–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12074. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718111/
12. Svirsky R, Pekar M, Uri Z, Ron R. Indications for genetic testing leading to termination of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 30]; (0123456789):2–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05289-4. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00404-019-05289-4
13. Wang J, Chen L, Zhou C, Wang L, Xie H, Xiao Y, et al. Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 8]; DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030. Available from: https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(18)30440-X/fulltext
14. Taboada N. Dilemas éticos en la interrupción del embarazo por malformaciones congénitas: Revisión bibliográfica. Rev Hum Med [Internet]. 2017 Abr [citado 2020 Jul 23]; 17(1): 17-30. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/hmc/v17n1/hmc03117.pdf
15. Yakıştıran B, Altınboğa O, Canpolat E, Çakar E, Çelen Ş, Çağlar A, et al. Analysis of cystic hygroma diagnosed in the first trimester: single-center experience. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: http://cms.galenos.com.tr/Uploads/Article_27925/JTGGA-0-0-En.pdf
16. Tinedo M, Santander F, Alonso J, Herrera A, S, Colombo C, Díaz M. Muerte fetal: caracterización epidemiológica. Salus [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2020 Jun 30]; 20(2):37-43. ISSN: 1316-7138. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=375947694008
17. Sancho Z. Perfil epidemiológico de malformaciones congénitas en el servicio de neonatología del Hospital General Ambato Del IESS. [Artículo Científico previo a la obtención del título de Médico Cirujano]. Repositorio Institucional UNIANDES [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 6]. Disponible en: http://dspace.uniandes.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/9357/1/ACUAMED005-2018.pdf
18. Santos M, Vázquez V, Torres C, Torres G, Aguiar D, Hernández H. Factores de riesgo relevantes asociados a las malformaciones congénitas en la provincia de Cienfuegos, 2008-2013. Medisur [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2020 Mar 30]; 14(6):737-747. ISSN 1727-897X. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ms/v14n6/ms09614.pdf
19. Tutunji L, Thekrallah F, Basha A, Awaysheh B, Amer S, Khatib L, et al. Prenatal detection of fetal heart disease at Jordan University Hospital : early experience in a developing country. Cardiology in the Young [Internet], 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 15]; 29(8):1072-1077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951119001550. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cardiology-in-the-young/article/abs/prenatal-detection-of-fetal-heart-disease-at-jordan-university-hospital-early-experience-in-a-developing-country/79FCA20A68B1D887B0E047EF0C323902
20. Miltoft C, Rode L, Bundgaard J, Johansen P, Tabor, A. Cell-Free Fetal DNA in the Early and Late First Trimester. Fetal Diagnostic Ther [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 30]; 1-9. DOI: 10.1159/000502179. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/502179

 

The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:

1. The authors retain the copyright and grant to the CAMbios MEDICAL-SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL HECAM the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material provided that they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.

2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for example, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was published. for the first time in the CAMbios MEDICAL-SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL HECAM.