Boy R, Schwartz IVD, Krug BC, Santana- da-Silva LC, Steiner CE, Acosta A X., Ribeiro, E. M.; Galera, M. F.; Leivas, P. G. C., Braz, M. Ethical issues related to the Access to orphan drugs in Brazil: the case of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. JME. 2011;037150: 1-7.
Daniels N. Justice and Justification. Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice, Cambridge University Press. 1996.
Denis A, Megaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S. A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2004; 97: 173-179.
Eurordis. The voice of 12.000 patients. Experiences and expecations of rare diseases patients on diagnosis and care in Europe. 2010.
Disponible en: http://www.eurordis.org/IMG/pdf/voice_12000_patients/EURORDISCARE_FULLBOOKr.pdf
Hawkes N, Cohen, D. What makes an Orphan Drug? BMJ. 2010; 341: 1076-1079.
Huyard C. How did uncommon disorders become ‘rare diseases’? History of a boundary object, Sociology of Heatlth & Illness. 2009; 31, 4: 463-477.
Largent E, Pearson S. Which Orphans Will Find a Home? The Rule of Rescue in Resource Allocation for Rare Diseases. Hastings Center Report. 2012; 42, Issue 1, pp.: 27-34.
Lazor R, D Amato Sizonenko, L. Maladies rares et médicaments orphelins: un enjeu de santé publique? Bulletin des médecins suisses. 2011; 92: 28-29; 1083-1086.
Luna F. Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability. Layers not Labels. IJFAB 2009; 2:1.
Nicholl D. Open letter to prime minister David Cameron and health secretary Andrew Lansley? BMJ. 2010; 341:1080.
Star S. L, Griesemer J. Institutional ecology, “translation” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley´s museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Social Studies of Science. 1989; 19: 387- 420.