Periodicidad semestral: flujo continuo.
ISSN - Electrónico: 2661-6947 / DOI: 10.36015 • LILACS BIREME (19784); LATINDEX (20666)
Ultrasonographically (US) guided core needle orpercutaneus biopsy is currently recognized as a reliable alternative to surgical biopsy for the histopathologic , giving to each patient an optimal managment. The advances in biopsy devices and techniques for sampling the breast lesión make less number of falsenegative results, additionally the operator experience makes ffom this technique the choice to breast lesions diagnostic. To support the effectiveness of this method is important have a radiologic-histologyc correlation y after that the postoperative confirmation. The improve of this technique to obtain better results is essential to avoid errors during the sampling and give an acuracy diagnosis giving to each patient the best treatment as possible. The breast lesión ultrasound visualization is the most important requirement, otherwise we should choose another method to make the biopsy, the better choice always if is possible will be the ultrasound because has many advantages as no radiation use, real time technique visualization, low cost, accessibility and many kind of devices availability to perform the procedure.
Parker S, Jobe W, Dennis M, Stavros T, Johnson K, Yakes W ,TruellJ, PriceJ, Kortz A, Clark DUS-guided automated
Large-Core Breast Biopsy. Radiog, 1993; 187:507-511
- Youkj, Kim E, Ko K, Kim M. Asymmetric Mammografphic findings Based on the Fourth Edition of BI-RADS: Types, evaluation, and Management. Radiog, 2008; 10:1148-1160
Youk J, Kim E, Kim M, Lee J, MD. Keun Oh K. Missed breast Cancers at US-guided Core Needle biospsy: How to Reduce Them. Radiog, 2007; 27:79-94
- Feder J, Shaw E, Hogge J, Wilken J. Unusual Breast Lesions: Radiologic-Pathologic correlation. Radiog, 1999; 19:11-26
Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, Fuchsjaeger M, Memarsadeghi M, Rudas M, Weber M, Liberman L, Helbich T. US-guided 14'gauge Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Results ofa Validation Study in 1352 Cases. Radiol, 2008; 248:406-413
- Abe H, Schmidt R, Kulkami K, Sennett Ch, Mueller J, Newstead G. Axillary Lymph Nodes Suspicious for Breast
Cáncer Metástasis: Sampling with US-guided 14-Gauge Core-Needle Biopsy— Clinical Experience in 100 Patients.
Radiol, 2009; 250(1):4 1-49
- Burkhardt J, Sunshine J. Core-Needle and Surgical Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Three Methods of Assessing Cost. Radiol, 1999; 212(1):181-188
- Foster M, Flelvie M, Gregory N, Rebner M, Nees A, Paramagul Ch. Lobular Carcinoma in Situ or Atypical
Lobular Hyperplasia at Core-Needle Biopsy: Is Excisional Biopsy Necessary? Radiol, 2004; 231 (3):813-819
- Liberman L, Feng T,Dershaw D, Morris E, Abramson A. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiol, 1998; 208(3):717-723
- Kaplan S, Racenstein M, Wong W, Hansen C, McCombs M, Bassett L. US-guided core biopsy of the breast with a coaxial system. Radiol, 1995; l94(2):573-575
Parker S, Burbank F, Jackman R, Aucreman C, Cardenosa G, Cink T, Coscia J, Eklund G, Evans W , Garver P.
Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-ínstitutional study. Radiolr 1994 193:2 359-364
Parker S, Jobe W, Dennis M, Stavros A, Johnson K, Yakes W, TruellJ, PriceJ, Kortz A , and Clark D. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiol 2002 200:430-456
- Youk J, Kim E, Kim M, Lee ], and Keun Oh K. Continuing Medical Education: Missed Breast Cancers at US-guided Core Needle Biopsy: How to Reduce Them Radiog 2007 27:1 79-94; doi: 10.1148/rg.271065029
- Harvey ] and Moran R. US-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique and pitfalls. Radiog 1998 18:4 867-877
- Berg W, Hurban R, Kumar D, Singh H, Brem R, and Gatewood O. Lessons from mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy. Radiog 1996 16:5 1111-1130
- Liu P, Valadez S,Chivers F, Roberts C, and Beauchamp C.Anatomically Based Guidelines for Core Needle Biopsy of Bone Tumors: Implications for Limb-sparing Surgery Radiog2007 27:1 189-205; doi: 10.1148/rg.271065092
- Irshad A , Ackerman S, Pope T, Moses C, Rumboldt T, and Panzegrau B.Continuing Medical Education: Rare Breast Lesions: Correlation of lmaging and Histologic Features with W H O Classification Radiog 2008 28:5 1399-1414
- Moon W, MyungJ, Lee Y, Park I, Noh D, and Jung G. US of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Radiog 2002 22:2 269-281
Smith D and Shiels W, 2nd From the R SN A refresher courses. Freehand interventional sonography in the breast: basic principies and clinical applications Radiog 1996 16:1 149-161
- Lim R and Goei R. Angiosarcoma of the Breast Radiol2007 2 7:suppl 1 S125-S130; doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075016
Youk ], Kim E, HeeKo K, and Jung Kim M. Continuing Medical Education: Asymmetric Mammographic Findings Based on the Fourth Edition ofBl-RAD S: Types, Evaluation, and Management Radiog2009 29:1 -33
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the copyright and grant to the CAMbios MEDICAL-SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL HECAM the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material provided that they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for example, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was published. for the first time in the CAMbios MEDICAL-SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL HECAM.