Protocolo de Manejo de Cirugía Metabólica y Bariátrica del Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín.
Resumen
1. INTRODUCCIÓN
La obesidad mórbida es una enfermedad crónica multifactorial asociada a complicaciones físicas y psicológicas que empeoran la calidad de vida de los pacientes y disminuyen su esperanza de vida; es un problema sanitario de primera magnitud debido al incremento de esta patología en Ecuador y a las dificultades que entraña su prevención y tratamiento. La cirugía de la obesidad es compleja, no exenta de complicaciones, cuyo objetivo es reducir de manera significativa las comorbilidades asociadas y mejorar el bienestar de los pacientes, cuya técnica quirúrgica sea fácil de reproducir, con porcentajes de revisión bajos y que constituya un tratamiento eficaz y seguro para la obesidad clínicamente grave, con evidencia que demuestra reducción de la mortalidad por todas las causas, mejoría en la expectativa y calidad de vida de los pacientes1
.
Descargas
Citas
Harraca J, Martínez P, et al. (CBM) C de CB y M. CONSENSO ARGENTINO INTERSOCIEDADES DE CIRUGÍA BARIÁTRICA Y METABÓLICA 2019. Asoc Argentina Cir. 2018;1–90. [Internet]. Disponible en: https://www.sac.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/consenso-intersocietario-cirugia-cariatrica-y-metabolica.pdf
Martínez Ramos C. Robotics and laparoscopic surgery. Volume 80, Issue 4, October 2006, 189-194 [Internet]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-739X(06)70956-3. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009739X06709563?via%3Dihub
Pampillón N, De C, Lic D, Reynoso C, Pagano LC, Marianela D, et al. Consenso Argentino de Nutrición en Cirugía Bariátrica. Argentine Consensus of Nutrition care in Bariatric Surgery. Actual en Nutr [Internet]. 2011;12(2):1976–80. Available from: https://xdoc.mx/download/consenso-argentino-de-nutricion-en-cirugia-bariatrica-5e2df38e9207c?hash=d191d27ce8bbc1bf582bccb853be90fd
Pampillón N, Reynoso C, Solimano M, Sánchez M, Ackerman MA, De Rosa P, et al. Actualización Del Consenso Argentino De Nutrición. En Cirugía Bariátrica. Órgano Disfunción la Soc Argentina Nutr [Internet]. 2016;1(2):1–51. Available from: https://www.sanutricion.org.ar/files/upload/files/CONSENSO_ARGENTINO_DE_NUTRICION_EN_CIRUGIA_BARIATRICA_2016_0.pdf
Marihart CL, Brunt AR, Marihart SA, Geraci AA. What’s Age Got to Do With It? A Comparison of Bariatric Surgical Outcomes Among Young, Midlife, Older and Oldest Adults. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2016; 2:233372141562181. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119804/
Garofalo F, Denis R, Pescarus R, Atlas H, Bacon SL, Garneau P. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients over 65 years old: a retrospective analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2017;13(1):1–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.05.020. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27516222/
Giordano S, Vvictorzon M. Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: A systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2015; 10:1627–35. [Internet]. Disponible en: DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S70313. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26508845/
Caceres BA, Moskowitz D, O’Connell T. A review of the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in adults over the age of 60: 2002-2013. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015; 27(7):403–10. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1002/2327-6924.12235.
Mellitus D. Who Would Have Thought It? An Operation Proves to Be the Most. Ann Surg. 1995; 222 (3):339–50. [Internet]. Available from: PMID: 7677463. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1234815/
Cummings DE, Cohen R V. Bariatric/Metabolic surgery to treat type 2 diabetes in patients with a bmi <35 kg/m2. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39 (6):924–33. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0350. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27222550/
Aguirre M, Alva O, Álvarez MG, Andreoni M, Babor E, Bottino V, et al. CONSENSO ARGENTINO DE CIRUGÍA METABÓLICA Sociedad Argentina de Diabetes (SAD), Sociedad Argentina de Nutrición (SAN), Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía de la Obesidad (SACO) ARGENTINE CONSENSUS ON METABOLIC SURGERY. Rev la Soc Argentina Diabetes [Internet]. 2015; 49 (December):95–110. Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-964759
Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, Schauer PR, Alberti KGMM, Zimmet PZ, et al. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: A joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(6):861–77. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0236. Available from: https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/39/6/861
Schauer PR. International Diabetes Federation position statement on bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes: implications for patients, physicians, and surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011; 7(4):448–51. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.05.015. Available from: https://www.soard.org/article/S1550-7289(11)00491-6/pdf
Mechanick JI, Kushner RF, Sugerman HJ, Gonzalez-Campoy JM, Collazo-Clavell ML, Guven S, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric s. Endocr Pract. 2008; 14(SUPPL. 1):1–83. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19319140/
L, Schiavo. Sans, A. Scalera G. Why preoperative weight loss in preparation for bariatric surgery is important. Obes Surg. 2016; 26(11):27902. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2381-z. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11695-016-2381-z
ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Internet]. 2015;11(4):739–48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.05.001. Available from: https://www.soard.org/article/S1550-7289(15)00143-4/fulltext
Privitera GP, Costa AL, Brusaferro S, Chirletti P, Crosasso P, Massimetti G, et al. Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus iodine for the prevention of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control [Internet]. 2017; 45(2):180–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.09.017. Available from: https://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-6553(16)30909-9/fulltext
Chopra T, Zhao JJ, Alangaden G, Wood MH, Kaye KS. Preventing surgical site infections after bariatric surgery: Value of perioperative antibiotic regimens. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2010; 10(3):317–28. Available from: PMID: 20545596. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20545596/
Chen X, Brathwaite CEM, Barkan A, Hall K, Chu G, Cherasard P, et al. Optimal Cefazolin Prophylactic Dosing for Bariatric Surgery: No Need for Higher Doses or Intraoperative Redosing. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2017; 27(3):626–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2331-9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11695-016-2331-9
Mahawar K, Carr W JN. Simultaneous Sleeve Gastrectomy and Hiatus Hernia Repair: a Systematic Review. Obes Surg. 2015; [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1470-0. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25348434/
Spivak H. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie. Obes Surg. 2014; 24(7):1095. [Internet]. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1267-1. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-014-1267-1
Patricio Cal, Luciano Deluca TJ& EF. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with 27 versus 39 Fr bougie calibration: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30:1812–5. [Internet]. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4450-0. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26194265/
Abdallah E, Nakeeb AE, Yousef T, Abdallah H, Abd M, Lotfy A, et al. Impact of Extent of Antral Resection on Surgical Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity (A Prospective Randomized Study). Obes Surg. 2014;(24):1587. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1242-x. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-014-1242-x
Berger, Clements RH, Morton JM, Huffman KM, Wolfe BM, Nguyen NT, Ko CY HM. The Impact of Different Surgical Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies: The First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg. 2016; 264(3):464/73. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001851. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27433904/
Susmallian S, Goitein D, Barnea R, Raziel A. Correct evaluation of gastric wall thickness may support a change in staplers’ size when performing sleeve gastrectomy. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017; 19(6):351–4. [Internet]. Available from: PMID: 28647931. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28647931/
Huang R, Gagner M. A Thickness Calibration Device Is Needed to Determine Staple Height and Avoid Leaks in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015; 25(12):2360–7. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1705-8. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-015-1705-8
Schwartz, ML, Drew, RL, Chazin-Caldie M. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Preoperative Determinants of Prolonged Operative Times, Conversion to Open Gastric Bypasses, and Postoperative Complications. November 2003. Obesity Surgery 13(5):734-8. [Internet] Available from: DOI:10.1381/096089203322509309
Tucker ON, Franks P, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Is concomitant cholecystectomy necessary in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery? Surgical Endoscopy Other Interv Tech. 2008; 22(11):2450–4. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9769-3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-008-9769-3
Mahawar KK SA. Contribution of Malabsorption to Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review. Obes Surg. 2017; 27(8):2194–206. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2762-y. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-017-2762-y
Orci L, Chilcott M, Huber O. Short versus long roux-limb length in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for the treatment of morbid and super obesity: A systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2011; 21(6):797–804. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0409-y. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21479976/
Daniel R Cottam, Samer G Mattar PRS. Laparoscopic Era of Operations for Morbid Obesity. Arch Surg. 2003; 138(4):367–75. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.4.367. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12686522/
Syed Husain, Ahmed R Ahmed, Joseph Johnson, Thad Boss WO. Small-bowel Obstruction After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Arch Surg. 2007; 142(10):988–93. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.10.988. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17938313/
Committee ACI. ASMBS Guideline on the Prevention and Detection of Gastrointestinal Leak After Gastric Bypass Including the Role of Imaging and Surgical Exploration. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009; 5(3):293–6. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.02.002. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19356997/
Giordano's, Salminen P, Biancari F, Victorzon M. Linear stapler technique may be safer than circular in gastrojejunal anastomosis for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Obes Surg. 2011; 21(12):1958–64. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0520-0. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-011-0520-0
Jiang HP, Lin L Le, Jiang X, Qiao HQ. Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2016; 32:150–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.024. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919116300541?via%3Dihub
José Hernández-Martínez MC-R. Gastric Bypass With Fixed 230-cm-long Common Limb and Variable Alimentary and Biliopancreatic Limbs in Morbid Obesity. Obes Surg. 2011; 21(12):1879–86. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0432-z. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-011-0432-z
Smith MD, Adeniji A, Wahed AS, Patterson E, Courcoulas AP, Dakin G, et al. Technical factors associated with anastomotic leak after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. May-Apr 2015;11(2):313–20. [Internet]. Available from: PMID: 25595919. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25595919/
Kamal K Mahawar, Parveen Kumar, Chetan Parmar, Yitka Graham, William R J Carr, Neil Jennings, Norbert Schroeder, Shlok Balupuri PKS. Small Bowel Limb Lengths and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):660–71. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2050-2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26749410/
Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, Ortiz-de-Solórzano J, Pérez-Miranda M, Castro-Alija MJ. Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Technique, Results, and Long-Term Follow-Up in 1200 Patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67. [Internet]. Available from: PMID: 27783366. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27783366/
Jerome Taylor, I Michael Leitman MH. Is Routine Cholecystectomy Necessary at the Time of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass? Obes Surg. 2006; 16(6):759/61. [Internet]. Available from: DOI: 10.1381/096089206777346781. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1381/096089206777346781
Ecuador. Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín. Protocolo de Cirugía Metabólica. HCAM. Código SGC-CG-PR-CME-012. V1. Vigencia 2016/09/15. Disponible en: https://bibliotecahcam.iess.gob.ec/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=81&query_desc=kw%2Cwrdl%3A%20protocolo
Los autores que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la REVISTA MÉDICA - CIENTÍFICA CAMbios HCAM el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en la REVISTA MÉDICA-CIENTÍFICA CAMbios HECAM.
1.jpg)