Periodicidad semestral: flujo continuo.
ISSN - Electrónico: 2661-6947 / DOI: 10.36015 • LILACS BIREME (19784); LATINDEX (20666)
Introduction: the use of video -assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy is now the preferred method for the treatment of cancer which has been increasing in surgical procedure. An analysis of the database of the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) showed that 20 % of all lobectomies were performed by VATS. This study reveals the most common use of this procedure for lung cancer pathology, which have been increasing in this last year (2013). This growth is due to the high evidence of the advantages of VATS lobectomy versus lobectomy by conventional thoracotomy. Case: in our case we tried to develop a study in which we can define the benefits of VATS, whereas the casuistry of our environment in the diagnosis of lung cancer, shown still limited in some places, but stresses that the surgical time has shown a slight decrease when using VATS, with shorter hospital stay, lower incidence of pain, with very low rate of surgical conversion, and a somewhat higher rate of complications than conventional thoracoscopic procedures.
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006; 81(2):421–5
Eric L. Grogan, MD, MPH, David R. Jones, MD. VATS Lobectomy is Better than Open Thoracotomy: What is the Evidence for Short Term Outcomes? Thorac Surg Clin, 2008,18:249–258
Hermansson U, Konstantinov IE, Aren C. Videoassisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the initial Swedish experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1998; 10(4):285–90
Kaseda S, Hangai N, Yamamoto S, et al. Lobectomy with extended lymph node dissection by video assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Surg Endosc, 1997; 11(7):703–6
Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C, et al. Long-term survival after video thoracoscopic lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Chest, 2004; 126(3):725–32
Jacobaeus HC. Ueber die Moglichkeit die Zystoskopie bei Untersuchung seroser hohlungen Anzuqwnden. Munch Med Wochenschr, 1910; 57:2090–2
Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, et al. Initial experience with video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 1993;56(6):1248–52
Kohno T, Murakami T, Wakabayashi A. Anatomic lobectomy of the lung by means of thoracoscopy. An experimental study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1993; 105(4):729–31
Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Mack MJ, et al. Postoperative pain related morbidity: video assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 1993; 56(6):1285–9
Walker WS, Carnochan FM, Pugh GC. Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1993; 106(6):1111–7
Giudicelli R, Thomas P, Lonjon T, et al. Video assisted minithoracotomy versus muscle sparing thoracotomy for performing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 1994; 58(3):712–7
Swanson SJ, Herndon JE 2nd, D’Amico TA, et al. Video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802da prospective, multi institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol, 2007; 25(31):4993–7
Shaw JP, Dembitzer FR, Wisnivesky JP, et al. Video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: state of the art and future directions. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 85(2):S705–9
Onaitis MW, Petersen RP, Balderson SS, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg, 2006; 244(3):420–5
Whitson BA, Andrade RS, Boettcher A, et al. Videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007; 83(6):1965–70
Muraoka M, Oka T, Akamine S, et al. Video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy reduces the morbidity after surgery for stage I non small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2006;54(2): 49–55
Demmy TL, Plante AJ, Nwogu CE, et al. Discharge independence with minimally invasive lobectomy. Am J Surg, 2004; 188(6):698–702
Cattaneo SM, Park BJ, Wilton AS, et al. Use of video assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in the elderly results in fewer complications. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 85(1):231–5
Garzon JC, Ng CS, Sihoe AD, et al. Video assisted thoracic surgery pulmonary resection for lung cancer in patients with poor lung function. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006; 81(6):1996–2003
Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, et al. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000; 70(5):1644–6
Watanabe A, Ohsawa H, Obama T, et al. Node dissection for solitary interlobar node metastasis from renal cell carcinoma by VATS. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005; 11(1):38–40
Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, et al. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2001; 20(3):455–63
Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, et al. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000; 70(1):243–7
Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, et al. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001; 72(2):362–5
Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Margolis M, et al. Video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003; 76(4):1009–14
Scott WJ, Howington J, Feigenberg S, et al. Treatment of non small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest, 2007; 132(3 Suppl): 234S–42S
Watanabe A, Koyanagi T, Obama T, et al. Assessment of node dissection for clinical stage I primary lung cancer by VATS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005; 27(5):745–52
Sagawa M, Sato M, Sakurada A, et al. A prospective trial of systemic nodal dissection for lung cancer by video assisted thoracic surgery: can it be perfect? Ann Thorac Surg, 2002;73(3):900–4
Demmy TL, Curtis JJ. Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high risk patients: a case control study. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999; 68(1):194–200
Demmy TL, Nwogu C. Is video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better? Quality of life considerations. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 85(2):S719–28
Tajiri M, Maehara T, Nakayama H, et al. Decreased invasiveness via two methods of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer, compared with open thoracotomy. Respirology, 2007; 12(2):207–11
Balduyck B, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, et al. Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery: a prospective study in 100 patients. Lung Cancer, 2007; 56(3): 423–31
Swanson SJ, Batirel HF. Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection for lung cancer. Surg Clin North Am, 2002; 82(3):541–59
Atkins BZ, Harpole DH Jr, Mangum JH, et al. Pulmonary segmentectomy by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy: reduced hospital length of stay with a minimally invasive approach. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007; 84(4):1107–12
Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T, Iwasaki A, et al. Videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy for small peripheral lung cancer tumors: intermediate results. Surg Endosc,2004; 18(11): 1657–62
Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, Keeley S, et al. Anatomic segmentectomy in the treatment of stage I non small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007; 84(3):926–32
Pettiford BL, Schuchert MJ, Santos R, et al. Role of sublobar resection (segmentectomy and wedge resection) in the surgical management of non small cell lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin, 2007; 17(2):175–90
El Sherif A, Fernando HC, Santos R, et al. Margin and local recurrence after sublobar resection of non small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007; 14(8):2400–5
Nwogu CE, Glinianski M, Demmy TL. Minimally invasive pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006; 82(1):e3–4
Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, et al. Early experience in video assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002; 21(5):864–8
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the copyright and grant to the CAMbios MEDICAL-SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL HECAM the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use the published material provided that they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for example, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it clearly indicates that the work was published. for the first time in the CAMbios MEDICAL-SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL HECAM.